Blog Editor
Nita A. Farahany
Prof. of Law and Philosophy
Prof. of Genome, Sciences and Policy
Duke Law School
*All opinions expressed on this blog are the author's alone and not those of any institution, organization or other entity with which she is affiliatedContributors
-
Recent Posts
- 8th Amendment
- adolescent
- age
- Asperger's
- automobile accident
- Brady
- brain injury
- capacity
- capital
- causation
- civil commitment
- competency
- confrontation clause
- cruel and unusual punishment
- CSI
- cumulative
- daubert
- death penalty
- debt collection
- developing brain
- diminished capacity
- disability benefits
- discrimination
- double-edged sword
- due process
- eggshell plaintiff
- empirical data
- employer
- expert testimony
- eyewitness testimony
- fitness to stand trial
- frontal lobe
- future dangerousness
- genetic disorder
- GINA
- habeas
- head injury
- iac
- indifference
- insanity
- insurance
- invisible injury
- involuntary
- jury instructions
- juvenile
- lead poisoning
- malingering
- memory
- mental state
- mitigation
- MRI
- negligence
- neuroimaging
- neuropsychiatric
- PET
- PET scan
- privacy
- protective custody
- self-incrimination
- sexually violent predator
- stop and arrest
- survey
- SVP
- taser
- testamentary
- TI
- tolling
- torts
- Tourette's
- toxic
- toxic torts
- transfer
- trusts
- waiver
- wills
Law & Biosciences Enthusiasts
- 28,438 hits
SiteMeter
Author Archives: Nita A. Farahany
The Daily Digest, 5/26/11
The case today presents an interesting application of the developing brain theory in juveniles. The defendant, who was convicted of two counts of second degree murder and sentenced to two consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole, sought to … Continue reading
Webinar of Interest
Of interest to readers of the blog. The ABA (Section of Science & Technology Law of the American Bar Association) and AALS are co-sponsoring a Neuroscience and Law webinar series of interest. I’ll be speaking at the last one, on … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/26/11
Civil commitment proceedings seem to offer a significant loophole to due process guarantees. After serving a prison term, an individual can be found to be a sexually violent predator and serve indefinitely in a mental health facility (with annual “reviews” … Continue reading
Posted in Civil, Neuroscience
Tagged civil commitment, competency, developing brain, SVP
Leave a comment
The Daily Digest, 4/25/11
In Schriro v. Landrigan, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on two questions: (1) Whether a defendant can knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to have mitigating evidence introduced on his behalf in a capital case, and (2) Whether … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/20/11
Is the Government Targeting our Genomes? I’ve reported previously on the claims by some private citizens that they are “targeted individuals” of government experiments. That case, and my knowledge of these claims to date was limited to targeting neurological functioning. … Continue reading
Posted in Neuroscience
Leave a comment
The Daily Digest, 4/19/11
The New York Times on Sunday ran a provocative op-ed co-authored by one of my colleagues at Vanderbilt, Nancy King. In that editorial, the authors call for reform to the endless process of habeas review, arguing that claims are reviewed, … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/18/11
Neuropsychologists v. Neuropsychiatrists The discussion by the majority and dissenting opinions in the case today about neuropsychological versus neuropsychiatric testing reveals just how detailed and technical the debates over cognitive neuroscience are becoming in legal cases. The dissent explains in … Continue reading
Posted in Neuroscience
Tagged automobile accident, damages, neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological
Leave a comment