Blog Editor
Nita A. Farahany
Prof. of Law and Philosophy
Prof. of Genome, Sciences and Policy
Duke Law School
*All opinions expressed on this blog are the author's alone and not those of any institution, organization or other entity with which she is affiliatedContributors
-
Recent Posts
- 8th Amendment adolescent age Asperger's automobile accident Brady brain injury capacity capital causation civil commitment competency confrontation clause cruel and unusual punishment CSI cumulative daubert death penalty debt collection developing brain diminished capacity disability benefits discrimination double-edged sword due process eggshell plaintiff empirical data employer expert testimony eyewitness testimony fitness to stand trial frontal lobe future dangerousness genetic disorder GINA habeas head injury iac indifference insanity insurance invisible injury involuntary jury instructions juvenile lead poisoning malingering memory mental state mitigation MRI negligence neuroimaging neuropsychiatric PET PET scan privacy protective custody self-incrimination sexually violent predator stop and arrest survey SVP taser testamentary TI tolling torts Tourette's toxic toxic torts transfer trusts waiver wills
Law & Biosciences Enthusiasts
- 27,567 hits
SiteMeter
Tag Archives: capital
The Daily Digest, 4/7/11
The case today presents a now-classic (and failed) attempt to use evidence of drug use and past head injuries as mitigating evidence in a capital case. In both of the defendant’s two retrials for sentencing, the jury sentenced the defendant … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/5/11
After the major decision handed down by the United States Supreme Court yesterday, all bets are off on the likely success of claims for ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to introduce mitigating brain evidence at trial. The case may … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience
Tagged capital, cumulative, double-edged sword, habeas, iac
Leave a comment
The Daily Digest – 2/9/11
Those following the intersection of cognitive neuroscience and law know that, to date, it has been used most frequently as mitigating evidence in capital sentencing. Like socioeconomic background or abusive childhood evidence, criminal defendants are now using cognitive neuroscience to … Continue reading
Posted in Civil, Criminal, Neuroscience
Tagged capital, cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty, iac, memory, mitigation
1 Comment
The Daily Digest, 2/8/11
Brain Dysfunction and Disability Benefits Strommer v. N.Y. State & Local Police And Fire Ret. Sys., 2011 WL 240153 (N.Y. App. 2011) A popular area for introducing cognitive neuroscience is to substantiate “invisible injuries” and claims in disability cases. In … Continue reading
Posted in Civil, Criminal, Neuroscience
Tagged capital, death penalty, disability benefits, frontal lobe, invisible injury, mitigation
1 Comment
