Blog Editor
Nita A. Farahany
Prof. of Law and Philosophy
Prof. of Genome, Sciences and Policy
Duke Law School
*All opinions expressed on this blog are the author's alone and not those of any institution, organization or other entity with which she is affiliatedContributors
-
Recent Posts
- 8th Amendment adolescent age Asperger's automobile accident Brady brain injury capacity capital causation civil commitment competency confrontation clause cruel and unusual punishment CSI cumulative daubert death penalty debt collection developing brain diminished capacity disability benefits discrimination double-edged sword due process eggshell plaintiff empirical data employer expert testimony eyewitness testimony fitness to stand trial frontal lobe future dangerousness genetic disorder GINA habeas head injury iac indifference insanity insurance invisible injury involuntary jury instructions juvenile lead poisoning malingering memory mental state mitigation MRI negligence neuroimaging neuropsychiatric PET PET scan privacy protective custody self-incrimination sexually violent predator stop and arrest survey SVP taser testamentary TI tolling torts Tourette's toxic toxic torts transfer trusts waiver wills
Law & Biosciences Enthusiasts
- 27,729 hits
SiteMeter
Tag Archives: competency
The Daily Digest, 6/6/2011
One of the most interesting claims using neurological evidence is withdrawal of a guilty plea, arguing the entry of that plea was involuntary or that the defendant lacked the competency to enter such a plea. This was a claim of … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/26/11
Civil commitment proceedings seem to offer a significant loophole to due process guarantees. After serving a prison term, an individual can be found to be a sexually violent predator and serve indefinitely in a mental health facility (with annual “reviews” … Continue reading
Posted in Civil, Neuroscience
Tagged civil commitment, competency, developing brain, SVP
Leave a comment
The Daily Digest, 4/25/11
In Schriro v. Landrigan, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on two questions: (1) Whether a defendant can knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to have mitigating evidence introduced on his behalf in a capital case, and (2) Whether … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 4/8/11
Competency proceedings seem like a natural place for criminal defendants to introduce expert evidence using cognitive neuroscience or behavioral genetics. In competency proceedings, while objective manifestations of competency are relevant, so is evidence about the particular defendant’s subjective capacity. A … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 3/30/11
I received a great tip from Anastasia Heeger, Senior Staff Attorney at the Office of the Appellate Defender in New York yesterday, about a case in which their office represented the defendant. The case presents a detailed look at the … Continue reading
The Daily Digest, 3/15/11
Today, I am presenting at a conference in New York City entitled Law and the Brain. This two-day conference delves into many of the different aspects of law and neuroscience discussed here on the Daily Digest, particularly from the criminal … Continue reading
The Daily Digest – 3/11/11
Competency proceedings are a natural area where one should expect increasing use of behavioral science to substantiate defendants’ claims of incompetency. Because competency is an individualized and subjective determination, rather than an objective or reasonableness determination, behavioral sciences (including behavioral … Continue reading
