Tag Archives: mitigation

The Daily Digest, 4/25/11

Posted on April 25, 2011 by

In Schriro v. Landrigan, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on two questions: (1) Whether a defendant can knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to have mitigating evidence introduced on his behalf in a capital case, and (2) Whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest, 4/13/11

Posted on April 13, 2011 by

[Note from Blog Editor Nita Farahany — I’m pleased to welcome and introduce guest contributor and author of this post, Ken Murray, Federal Public Defender in Arizona, Capital Habeas Unit] Offense Heinousness, Double-Edged Sword of Brain Damage “If the evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest, 4/7/11

Posted on April 7, 2011 by

The case today presents a now-classic (and failed) attempt to use evidence of drug use and past head injuries as mitigating evidence in a capital case. In both of the defendant’s two retrials for sentencing, the jury sentenced the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

The Daily Digest, 3/22/11

Posted on March 22, 2011 by

The use of “developing brain” science in criminal cases seems to be increasing, and today is yet another example of an attempt to use developing brain science to mitigate a criminal defendant’s sentence. The theory in the case today is … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest – 3/7/11

Posted on March 7, 2011 by

Does brain damage mitigate criminal responsibility or punishment ? Should it count as “good” evidence about a defendant’s reasons for acting that should be balanced against “bad” reasons for his criminal conduct? In the case of Schriro v. Landrigan, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Daily Digest, 3/3/11

Posted on March 3, 2011 by

The Law and Memory Conference at Stanford Law School on April 1, 2011 will bring together leading scientists, practitioners and scholars on the intersection of law and memory. The conference will begin with the science, and then focus on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest, 2/28/11

Posted on February 28, 2011 by

The week starts off with two failed brain damage/mitigation/capital cases. The first case is failure of mitigation at the trial level, and the second is a reversal of a successful PCRA claim. Neurological evidence is now introduced as mitigating evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest, 2/24/11

Posted on February 24, 2011 by

As I discussed earlier this week, criminal defendants often unsuccessfully seek post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel at trial for failing to introduce mitigating evidence of brain dysfunction. In my earlier post I noted the difference between a claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Daily Digest, 2/21/11

Posted on February 21, 2011 by

Criminal defendants face a high burden when seeking relief for ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. A substantial portion of cognitive neuroscience or behavioral genetics based claims are raised by capital defendants who claim to have received ineffective assistance of … Continue reading →

Posted in Neuroscience | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Daily Digest, 2/15/11

Posted on February 15, 2011 by

I’ve previously discussed how brain dysfunction may be a double-edged sword in criminal cases. Proving a criminal defendant is more impulsive than most, more likely to act irrationally, or more likely to react violently than others under stressful circumstances may … Continue reading →

Posted in Criminal, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment